Hello,
This is a proposal to support consulting / protecting / unprotecting branches for a specific repository.
I copied the existing code for "issues" report and adapted to branches. There is no change of legacy code so I do not expect any impact.
Supported commands are "list", "protect", "unprotect":
- "List" print the list of branches with some available fields from gitea.Branch type.
- "protect" creates a gitea.BranchProtection with some default parameters for some specific branches
- "unprotect" destroys gitea.BranchProtection for some specific branches
What is printed now could be enriched with additional information gitea datatypes already offer.
Could you please evaluate this proposal?
I would be happy to receive any comment or remark to take into account.
**tea branches unprotect** --login opsi --repo opensky main
**tea branches list** --login opsi --repo opensky --fields name,protected,user-can-merge,user-can-push,protection
[name protected user-can-merge user-can-push protection]
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
| NAME | PROTECTED | USER-CAN-MERGE | USER-CAN-PUSH | PROTECTION |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
| b_test | false | true | true | <None> |
| main | false | true | true | <None> |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+------------+
**tea branches protect** --login opsi --repo opensky main
**tea branches list** --login opsi --repo opensky --fields name,protected,user-can-merge,user-can-push,protection
[name protected user-can-merge user-can-push protection]
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
| NAME | PROTECTED | USER-CAN-MERGE | USER-CAN-PUSH | PROTECTION |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
| b_test | false | true | true | <None> |
| main | true | true | false | - enable-push: false |
| | | | | - approving: - |
| | | | | merging: - pushing: |
| | | | | |
+--------+-----------+----------------+---------------+----------------------+
Following commands run OK:
> make test
> make fmt
> make lint
Co-authored-by: Leonard Vimond <leonard.vimond.e@thalesdigital.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/645
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: leonard.vimond <leonard.vimond@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-committed-by: leonard.vimond <leonard.vimond@noreply.gitea.com>
Relates to #22, but adds in all the necessary flags. I tested it manually with some scripting and it works as intended.
Signed-off-by: Sienna Lloyd <sienna@linux.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/587
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: Sienna Lloyd <sienna@linux.com>
Co-committed-by: Sienna Lloyd <sienna@linux.com>
As title, then we could potentially start ingesting these in the docs repo as they are expanded.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/565
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
leonard.vimond