forked from gitea/gitea
1
0
Fork 0
gitea/models/issues/issue_test.go

618 lines
19 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package issues_test
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"sort"
"sync"
"testing"
2017-07-27 09:20:38 +08:00
"time"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/organization"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"xorm.io/builder"
)
func TestIssue_ReplaceLabels(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-19 03:17:39 +08:00
testSuccess := func(issueID int64, labelIDs, expectedLabelIDs []int64) {
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: issueID})
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: issue.RepoID})
doer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
labels := make([]*issues_model.Label, len(labelIDs))
for i, labelID := range labelIDs {
labels[i] = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: labelID, RepoID: repo.ID})
}
assert.NoError(t, issues_model.ReplaceIssueLabels(issue, labels, doer))
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-19 03:17:39 +08:00
unittest.AssertCount(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issueID}, len(expectedLabelIDs))
for _, labelID := range expectedLabelIDs {
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issueID, LabelID: labelID})
}
}
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-19 03:17:39 +08:00
testSuccess(1, []int64{2}, []int64{2})
testSuccess(1, []int64{1, 2}, []int64{1, 2})
testSuccess(1, []int64{}, []int64{})
// mutually exclusive scoped labels 7 and 8
testSuccess(18, []int64{6, 7}, []int64{6, 7})
testSuccess(18, []int64{7, 8}, []int64{8})
testSuccess(18, []int64{6, 8, 7}, []int64{6, 7})
}
func Test_GetIssueIDsByRepoID(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
ids, err := issues_model.GetIssueIDsByRepoID(db.DefaultContext, 1)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Len(t, ids, 5)
}
func TestIssueAPIURL(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 1})
err := issue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, "https://try.gitea.io/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/issues/1", issue.APIURL())
}
2017-03-15 09:10:35 +08:00
func TestGetIssuesByIDs(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
testSuccess := func(expectedIssueIDs, nonExistentIssueIDs []int64) {
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012) Fix #24662. Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged) ## Background In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all) on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is why the results could be incomplete. To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional conditions when searching with the indexer. ## Major changes - Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as filter conditions. - Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64, limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options *SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now. - Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use `IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of the queue. - Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions. - Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove `issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is the entry point to search issues. - Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests. - Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 14:28:53 +08:00
issues, err := issues_model.GetIssuesByIDs(db.DefaultContext, append(expectedIssueIDs, nonExistentIssueIDs...), true)
2017-03-15 09:10:35 +08:00
assert.NoError(t, err)
actualIssueIDs := make([]int64, len(issues))
for i, issue := range issues {
actualIssueIDs[i] = issue.ID
}
assert.Equal(t, expectedIssueIDs, actualIssueIDs)
}
testSuccess([]int64{1, 2, 3}, []int64{})
testSuccess([]int64{1, 2, 3}, []int64{unittest.NonexistentID})
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012) Fix #24662. Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged) ## Background In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all) on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is why the results could be incomplete. To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional conditions when searching with the indexer. ## Major changes - Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as filter conditions. - Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64, limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options *SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now. - Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use `IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of the queue. - Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions. - Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove `issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is the entry point to search issues. - Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests. - Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 14:28:53 +08:00
testSuccess([]int64{3, 2, 1}, []int64{})
2017-03-15 09:10:35 +08:00
}
func TestGetParticipantIDsByIssue(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
2017-06-05 01:39:08 +08:00
checkParticipants := func(issueID int64, userIDs []int) {
issue, err := issues_model.GetIssueByID(db.DefaultContext, issueID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
participants, err := issue.GetParticipantIDsByIssue(db.DefaultContext)
if assert.NoError(t, err) {
2017-06-05 01:39:08 +08:00
participantsIDs := make([]int, len(participants))
for i, uid := range participants {
participantsIDs[i] = int(uid)
2017-03-21 08:55:00 +08:00
}
2017-06-05 01:39:08 +08:00
sort.Ints(participantsIDs)
sort.Ints(userIDs)
2017-06-05 01:39:08 +08:00
assert.Equal(t, userIDs, participantsIDs)
}
}
// User 1 is issue1 poster (see fixtures/issue.yml)
// User 2 only labeled issue1 (see fixtures/comment.yml)
// Users 3 and 5 made actual comments (see fixtures/comment.yml)
// User 3 is inactive, thus not active participant
checkParticipants(1, []int{1, 5})
}
func TestIssue_ClearLabels(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
issueID int64
doerID int64
}{
{1, 2}, // non-pull-request, has labels
{2, 2}, // pull-request, has labels
{3, 2}, // pull-request, has no labels
}
for _, test := range tests {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: test.issueID})
doer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: test.doerID})
assert.NoError(t, issues_model.ClearIssueLabels(issue, doer))
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: test.issueID})
}
}
2017-07-27 09:20:38 +08:00
func TestUpdateIssueCols(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{})
2017-07-27 09:20:38 +08:00
const newTitle = "New Title for unit test"
issue.Title = newTitle
prevContent := issue.Content
issue.Content = "This should have no effect"
now := time.Now().Unix()
assert.NoError(t, issues_model.UpdateIssueCols(db.DefaultContext, issue, "name"))
2017-07-27 09:20:38 +08:00
then := time.Now().Unix()
updatedIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: issue.ID})
2017-07-27 09:20:38 +08:00
assert.EqualValues(t, newTitle, updatedIssue.Title)
assert.EqualValues(t, prevContent, updatedIssue.Content)
unittest.AssertInt64InRange(t, now, then, int64(updatedIssue.UpdatedUnix))
2017-07-27 09:20:38 +08:00
}
func TestIssues(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
for _, test := range []struct {
Opts issues_model.IssuesOptions
ExpectedIssueIDs []int64
}{
{
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
AssigneeID: 1,
SortType: "oldest",
},
[]int64{1, 6},
},
{
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
RepoCond: builder.In("repo_id", 1, 3),
SortType: "oldest",
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012) Fix #24662. Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged) ## Background In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all) on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is why the results could be incomplete. To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional conditions when searching with the indexer. ## Major changes - Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as filter conditions. - Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64, limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options *SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now. - Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use `IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of the queue. - Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions. - Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove `issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is the entry point to search issues. - Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests. - Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 14:28:53 +08:00
Paginator: &db.ListOptions{
API add/generalize pagination (#9452) * paginate results * fixed deadlock * prevented breaking change * updated swagger * go fmt * fixed find topic * go mod tidy * go mod vendor with go1.13.5 * fixed repo find topics * fixed unit test * added Limit method to Engine struct; use engine variable when provided; fixed gitignore * use ItemsPerPage for default pagesize; fix GetWatchers, getOrgUsersByOrgID and GetStargazers; fix GetAllCommits headers; reverted some changed behaviors * set Page value on Home route * improved memory allocations * fixed response headers * removed logfiles * fixed import order * import order * improved swagger * added function to get models.ListOptions from context * removed pagesize diff on unit test * fixed imports * removed unnecessary struct field * fixed go fmt * scoped PR * code improvements * code improvements * go mod tidy * fixed import order * fixed commit statuses session * fixed files headers * fixed headers; added pagination for notifications * go mod tidy * go fmt * removed Private from user search options; added setting.UI.IssuePagingNum as default valeu on repo's issues list * Apply suggestions from code review Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-Authored-By: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * fixed build error * CI.restart() * fixed merge conflicts resolve * fixed conflicts resolve * improved FindTrackedTimesOptions.ToOptions() method * added backwards compatibility on ListReleases request; fixed issue tracked time ToSession * fixed build error; fixed swagger template * fixed swagger template * fixed ListReleases backwards compatibility * added page to user search route Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2020-01-25 03:00:29 +08:00
Page: 1,
PageSize: 4,
},
},
[]int64{1, 2, 3, 5},
},
{
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
LabelIDs: []int64{1},
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012) Fix #24662. Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged) ## Background In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all) on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is why the results could be incomplete. To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional conditions when searching with the indexer. ## Major changes - Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as filter conditions. - Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64, limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options *SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now. - Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use `IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of the queue. - Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions. - Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove `issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is the entry point to search issues. - Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests. - Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 14:28:53 +08:00
Paginator: &db.ListOptions{
API add/generalize pagination (#9452) * paginate results * fixed deadlock * prevented breaking change * updated swagger * go fmt * fixed find topic * go mod tidy * go mod vendor with go1.13.5 * fixed repo find topics * fixed unit test * added Limit method to Engine struct; use engine variable when provided; fixed gitignore * use ItemsPerPage for default pagesize; fix GetWatchers, getOrgUsersByOrgID and GetStargazers; fix GetAllCommits headers; reverted some changed behaviors * set Page value on Home route * improved memory allocations * fixed response headers * removed logfiles * fixed import order * import order * improved swagger * added function to get models.ListOptions from context * removed pagesize diff on unit test * fixed imports * removed unnecessary struct field * fixed go fmt * scoped PR * code improvements * code improvements * go mod tidy * fixed import order * fixed commit statuses session * fixed files headers * fixed headers; added pagination for notifications * go mod tidy * go fmt * removed Private from user search options; added setting.UI.IssuePagingNum as default valeu on repo's issues list * Apply suggestions from code review Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-Authored-By: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * fixed build error * CI.restart() * fixed merge conflicts resolve * fixed conflicts resolve * improved FindTrackedTimesOptions.ToOptions() method * added backwards compatibility on ListReleases request; fixed issue tracked time ToSession * fixed build error; fixed swagger template * fixed swagger template * fixed ListReleases backwards compatibility * added page to user search route Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2020-01-25 03:00:29 +08:00
Page: 1,
PageSize: 4,
},
},
[]int64{2, 1},
},
{
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
LabelIDs: []int64{1, 2},
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012) Fix #24662. Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged) ## Background In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all) on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is why the results could be incomplete. To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional conditions when searching with the indexer. ## Major changes - Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as filter conditions. - Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64, limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options *SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now. - Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use `IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of the queue. - Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions. - Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove `issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is the entry point to search issues. - Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests. - Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 14:28:53 +08:00
Paginator: &db.ListOptions{
API add/generalize pagination (#9452) * paginate results * fixed deadlock * prevented breaking change * updated swagger * go fmt * fixed find topic * go mod tidy * go mod vendor with go1.13.5 * fixed repo find topics * fixed unit test * added Limit method to Engine struct; use engine variable when provided; fixed gitignore * use ItemsPerPage for default pagesize; fix GetWatchers, getOrgUsersByOrgID and GetStargazers; fix GetAllCommits headers; reverted some changed behaviors * set Page value on Home route * improved memory allocations * fixed response headers * removed logfiles * fixed import order * import order * improved swagger * added function to get models.ListOptions from context * removed pagesize diff on unit test * fixed imports * removed unnecessary struct field * fixed go fmt * scoped PR * code improvements * code improvements * go mod tidy * fixed import order * fixed commit statuses session * fixed files headers * fixed headers; added pagination for notifications * go mod tidy * go fmt * removed Private from user search options; added setting.UI.IssuePagingNum as default valeu on repo's issues list * Apply suggestions from code review Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-Authored-By: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * fixed build error * CI.restart() * fixed merge conflicts resolve * fixed conflicts resolve * improved FindTrackedTimesOptions.ToOptions() method * added backwards compatibility on ListReleases request; fixed issue tracked time ToSession * fixed build error; fixed swagger template * fixed swagger template * fixed ListReleases backwards compatibility * added page to user search route Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2020-01-25 03:00:29 +08:00
Page: 1,
PageSize: 4,
},
},
[]int64{}, // issues with **both** label 1 and 2, none of these issues matches, TODO: add more tests
},
} {
issues, err := issues_model.Issues(db.DefaultContext, &test.Opts)
assert.NoError(t, err)
if assert.Len(t, issues, len(test.ExpectedIssueIDs)) {
for i, issue := range issues {
assert.EqualValues(t, test.ExpectedIssueIDs[i], issue.ID)
}
}
}
}
func TestGetUserIssueStats(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
for _, test := range []struct {
FilterMode int
Opts issues_model.IssuesOptions
ExpectedIssueStats issues_model.IssueStats
}{
{
issues_model.FilterModeAll,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1}),
RepoIDs: []int64{1},
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 1, // 6
AssignCount: 1, // 6
CreateCount: 1, // 6
OpenCount: 1, // 6
ClosedCount: 1, // 1
},
},
{
issues_model.FilterModeAll,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1}),
RepoIDs: []int64{1},
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
IsClosed: util.OptionalBoolTrue,
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 1, // 6
AssignCount: 0,
CreateCount: 0,
OpenCount: 1, // 6
ClosedCount: 1, // 1
},
},
{
issues_model.FilterModeAssign,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1}),
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 1, // 6
AssignCount: 1, // 6
CreateCount: 1, // 6
OpenCount: 1, // 6
ClosedCount: 0,
},
},
{
issues_model.FilterModeCreate,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1}),
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 1, // 6
AssignCount: 1, // 6
CreateCount: 1, // 6
OpenCount: 1, // 6
ClosedCount: 0,
},
},
{
issues_model.FilterModeMention,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1}),
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 1, // 6
AssignCount: 1, // 6
CreateCount: 1, // 6
MentionCount: 0,
OpenCount: 0,
ClosedCount: 0,
},
},
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
{
issues_model.FilterModeCreate,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1}),
IssueIDs: []int64{1},
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 1, // 1
AssignCount: 1, // 1
CreateCount: 1, // 1
OpenCount: 1, // 1
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
ClosedCount: 0,
},
},
{
issues_model.FilterModeAll,
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
User: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2}),
Org: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &organization.Organization{ID: 3}),
Team: unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &organization.Team{ID: 7}),
IsPull: util.OptionalBoolFalse,
},
issues_model.IssueStats{
YourRepositoriesCount: 2,
AssignCount: 1,
CreateCount: 1,
OpenCount: 2,
},
},
} {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%#v", test.Opts), func(t *testing.T) {
stats, err := issues_model.GetUserIssueStats(test.FilterMode, test.Opts)
if !assert.NoError(t, err) {
return
}
assert.Equal(t, test.ExpectedIssueStats, *stats)
})
}
}
Shows total tracked time in issue and milestone list (#3341) * Show total tracked time in issue and milestone list Show total tracked time at issue page Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Optimizing TotalTimes by using SumInt Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fixing wrong total times for milestones caused by a missing JOIN Adding unit tests for total times Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Logging error instead of ignoring it Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Correcting spelling mistakes Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Change error message to a short version Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add error handling to TotalTimes Add variable for totalTimes Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de> * Introduce TotalTrackedTimes as variable of issue Load TotalTrackedTimes by loading attributes of IssueList Load TotalTrackedTimes by loading attributes of single issue Add Sec2Time as helper to use it in templates Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fixed test + gofmt Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Load TotalTrackedTimes via MilestoneList instead of single requests Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add documentation for MilestoneList Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add documentation for MilestoneList Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix test Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Change comment from SQL query to description Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix unit test by using int64 instead of int Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix unit test by using int64 instead of int Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Check if timetracker is enabled Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix test by enabling timetracking Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
2018-04-29 13:58:47 +08:00
func TestIssue_loadTotalTimes(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
ms, err := issues_model.GetIssueByID(db.DefaultContext, 2)
Shows total tracked time in issue and milestone list (#3341) * Show total tracked time in issue and milestone list Show total tracked time at issue page Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Optimizing TotalTimes by using SumInt Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fixing wrong total times for milestones caused by a missing JOIN Adding unit tests for total times Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Logging error instead of ignoring it Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Correcting spelling mistakes Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Change error message to a short version Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add error handling to TotalTimes Add variable for totalTimes Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de> * Introduce TotalTrackedTimes as variable of issue Load TotalTrackedTimes by loading attributes of IssueList Load TotalTrackedTimes by loading attributes of single issue Add Sec2Time as helper to use it in templates Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fixed test + gofmt Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Load TotalTrackedTimes via MilestoneList instead of single requests Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add documentation for MilestoneList Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add documentation for MilestoneList Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix test Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Change comment from SQL query to description Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix unit test by using int64 instead of int Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix unit test by using int64 instead of int Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Check if timetracker is enabled Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix test by enabling timetracking Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
2018-04-29 13:58:47 +08:00
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.NoError(t, ms.LoadTotalTimes(db.DefaultContext))
assert.Equal(t, int64(3682), ms.TotalTrackedTime)
Shows total tracked time in issue and milestone list (#3341) * Show total tracked time in issue and milestone list Show total tracked time at issue page Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Optimizing TotalTimes by using SumInt Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fixing wrong total times for milestones caused by a missing JOIN Adding unit tests for total times Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Logging error instead of ignoring it Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Correcting spelling mistakes Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Change error message to a short version Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add error handling to TotalTimes Add variable for totalTimes Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de> * Introduce TotalTrackedTimes as variable of issue Load TotalTrackedTimes by loading attributes of IssueList Load TotalTrackedTimes by loading attributes of single issue Add Sec2Time as helper to use it in templates Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fixed test + gofmt Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Load TotalTrackedTimes via MilestoneList instead of single requests Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add documentation for MilestoneList Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Add documentation for MilestoneList Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix test Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Change comment from SQL query to description Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix unit test by using int64 instead of int Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix unit test by using int64 instead of int Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Check if timetracker is enabled Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software> * Fix test by enabling timetracking Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
2018-04-29 13:58:47 +08:00
}
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
func TestGetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
for _, test := range []struct {
Opts issues_model.IssuesOptions
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
ExpectedRepoIDs []int64
}{
{
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
AssigneeID: 2,
},
[]int64{3, 32},
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
},
{
issues_model.IssuesOptions{
RepoCond: builder.In("repo_id", 1, 2),
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
},
[]int64{1, 2},
},
} {
repoIDs, err := issues_model.GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions(&test.Opts, user)
issue search on my related repositories (#9758) * adding search capability to user's issues dashboard * global issue search * placement of search bar on issues dashboard * fixed some bugs in the issue dashboard search * added unit test because IssueIDs option was added to UserIssueStatsOptions * some renaming of fields in the issue dashboard code to be more clear; also trying to fix issue of searching the right repos based on the filter * added unit test fro GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions; fixed search lost on pagination; using shown issue status for open/close count; removed some debugging * fix issue with all count showing incorrectly * removed todo comment left in by mistake * typo pulling wrong count * fxied all count being off when selecting repositories * setting the opts.IsClosed after pulling repos to search, this is done so that the list of repo ids to serach for the keyword is not limited, we need to get all the issue ids for the shown issue stats * added "accessibleRepositoryCondition" check on the query to pull the repo ids to search for issues, this is an added protection to ensure we don't search repos the user does not have access to * added code so that in the issues search, we won't use an in clause of issues ids that goes over 1000 * fixed unit test * using 950 as the limit for issue search, removed unneeded group by in GetRepoIDsForIssuesOptions, showing search on pulls dashboard page too (not just issues) Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-02-29 14:52:05 +08:00
assert.NoError(t, err)
if assert.Len(t, repoIDs, len(test.ExpectedRepoIDs)) {
for i, repoID := range repoIDs {
assert.EqualValues(t, test.ExpectedRepoIDs[i], repoID)
}
}
}
}
func testInsertIssue(t *testing.T, title, content string, expectIndex int64) *issues_model.Issue {
var newIssue issues_model.Issue
t.Run(title, func(t *testing.T) {
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
issue := issues_model.Issue{
RepoID: repo.ID,
PosterID: user.ID,
Poster: user,
Title: title,
Content: content,
}
err := issues_model.NewIssue(repo, &issue, nil, nil)
assert.NoError(t, err)
has, err := db.GetEngine(db.DefaultContext).ID(issue.ID).Get(&newIssue)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, has)
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.Title, newIssue.Title)
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.Content, newIssue.Content)
if expectIndex > 0 {
assert.EqualValues(t, expectIndex, newIssue.Index)
}
})
return &newIssue
}
func TestIssue_InsertIssue(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
// there are 5 issues and max index is 5 on repository 1, so this one should 6
issue := testInsertIssue(t, "my issue1", "special issue's comments?", 6)
_, err := db.GetEngine(db.DefaultContext).ID(issue.ID).Delete(new(issues_model.Issue))
assert.NoError(t, err)
issue = testInsertIssue(t, `my issue2, this is my son's love \n \r \ `, "special issue's '' comments?", 7)
_, err = db.GetEngine(db.DefaultContext).ID(issue.ID).Delete(new(issues_model.Issue))
assert.NoError(t, err)
}
func TestIssue_ResolveMentions(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
testSuccess := func(owner, repo, doer string, mentions []string, expected []int64) {
o := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{LowerName: owner})
r := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{OwnerID: o.ID, LowerName: repo})
issue := &issues_model.Issue{RepoID: r.ID}
d := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{LowerName: doer})
resolved, err := issues_model.ResolveIssueMentionsByVisibility(db.DefaultContext, issue, d, mentions)
assert.NoError(t, err)
ids := make([]int64, len(resolved))
for i, user := range resolved {
ids[i] = user.ID
}
sort.Slice(ids, func(i, j int) bool { return ids[i] < ids[j] })
assert.EqualValues(t, expected, ids)
}
// Public repo, existing user
testSuccess("user2", "repo1", "user1", []string{"user5"}, []int64{5})
// Public repo, non-existing user
testSuccess("user2", "repo1", "user1", []string{"nonexisting"}, []int64{})
// Public repo, doer
testSuccess("user2", "repo1", "user1", []string{"user1"}, []int64{})
// Private repo, team member
testSuccess("user17", "big_test_private_4", "user20", []string{"user2"}, []int64{2})
// Private repo, not a team member
testSuccess("user17", "big_test_private_4", "user20", []string{"user5"}, []int64{})
// Private repo, whole team
testSuccess("user17", "big_test_private_4", "user15", []string{"user17/owners"}, []int64{18})
}
func TestResourceIndex(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
var wg sync.WaitGroup
for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
wg.Add(1)
go func(i int) {
testInsertIssue(t, fmt.Sprintf("issue %d", i+1), "my issue", 0)
wg.Done()
}(i)
}
wg.Wait()
}
func TestCorrectIssueStats(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
// Because the condition is to have chunked database look-ups,
// We have to more issues than `maxQueryParameters`, we will insert.
// maxQueryParameters + 10 issues into the testDatabase.
// Each new issues will have a constant description "Bugs are nasty"
// Which will be used later on.
issueAmount := issues_model.MaxQueryParameters + 10
var wg sync.WaitGroup
for i := 0; i < issueAmount; i++ {
wg.Add(1)
go func(i int) {
testInsertIssue(t, fmt.Sprintf("Issue %d", i+1), "Bugs are nasty", 0)
wg.Done()
}(i)
}
wg.Wait()
// Now we will get all issueID's that match the "Bugs are nasty" query.
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012) Fix #24662. Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged) ## Background In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all) on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is why the results could be incomplete. To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional conditions when searching with the indexer. ## Major changes - Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as filter conditions. - Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64, limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options *SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now. - Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use `IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of the queue. - Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions. - Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove `issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is the entry point to search issues. - Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests. - Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 14:28:53 +08:00
issues, err := issues_model.Issues(context.TODO(), &issues_model.IssuesOptions{
Paginator: &db.ListOptions{
PageSize: issueAmount,
},
RepoIDs: []int64{1},
})
total := int64(len(issues))
var ids []int64
for _, issue := range issues {
if issue.Content == "Bugs are nasty" {
ids = append(ids, issue.ID)
}
}
// Just to be sure.
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, issueAmount, total)
// Now we will call the GetIssueStats with these IDs and if working,
// get the correct stats back.
issueStats, err := issues_model.GetIssueStats(&issues_model.IssuesOptions{
RepoIDs: []int64{1},
IssueIDs: ids,
})
// Now check the values.
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, issueStats.OpenCount, issueAmount)
}
Store the foreign ID of issues during migration (#18446) Storing the foreign identifier of an imported issue in the database is a prerequisite to implement idempotent migrations or mirror for issues. It is a baby step towards mirroring that introduces a new table. At the moment when an issue is created by the Gitea uploader, it fails if the issue already exists. The Gitea uploader could be modified so that, instead of failing, it looks up the database to find an existing issue. And if it does it would update the issue instead of creating a new one. However this is not currently possible because an information is missing from the database: the foreign identifier that uniquely represents the issue being migrated is not persisted. With this change, the foreign identifier is stored in the database and the Gitea uploader will then be able to run a query to figure out if a given issue being imported already exists. The implementation of mirroring for issues, pull requests, releases, etc. can be done in three steps: 1. Store an identifier for the element being mirrored (issue, pull request...) in the database (this is the purpose of these changes) 2. Modify the Gitea uploader to be able to update an existing repository with all it contains (issues, pull request...) instead of failing if it exists 3. Optimize the Gitea uploader to speed up the updates, when possible. The second step creates code that does not yet exist to enable idempotent migrations with the Gitea uploader. When a migration is done for the first time, the behavior is not changed. But when a migration is done for a repository that already exists, this new code is used to update it. The third step can use the code created in the second step to optimize and speed up migrations. For instance, when a migration is resumed, an issue that has an update time that is not more recent can be skipped and only newly created issues or updated ones will be updated. Another example of optimization could be that a webhook notifies Gitea when an issue is updated. The code triggered by the webhook would download only this issue and call the code created in the second step to update the issue, as if it was in the process of an idempotent migration. The ForeignReferences table is added to contain local and foreign ID pairs relative to a given repository. It can later be used for pull requests and other artifacts that can be mirrored. Although the foreign id could be added as a single field in issues or pull requests, it would need to be added to all tables that represent something that can be mirrored. Creating a new table makes for a simpler and more generic design. The drawback is that it requires an extra lookup to obtain the information. However, this extra information is only required during migration or mirroring and does not impact the way Gitea currently works. The foreign identifier of an issue or pull request is similar to the identifier of an external user, which is stored in reactions, issues, etc. as OriginalPosterID and so on. The representation of a user is however different and the ability of users to link their account to an external user at a later time is also a logic that is different from what is involved in mirroring or migrations. For these reasons, despite some commonalities, it is unclear at this time how the two tables (foreign reference and external user) could be merged together. The ForeignID field is extracted from the issue migration context so that it can be dumped in files with dump-repo and later restored via restore-repo. The GetAllComments downloader method is introduced to simplify the implementation and not overload the Context for the purpose of pagination. It also clarifies in which context the comments are paginated and in which context they are not. The Context interface is no longer useful for the purpose of retrieving the LocalID and ForeignID since they are now both available from the PullRequest and Issue struct. The Reviewable and Commentable interfaces replace and serve the same purpose. The Context data member of PullRequest and Issue becomes a DownloaderContext to clarify that its purpose is not to support in memory operations while the current downloader is acting but is not otherwise persisted. It is, for instance, used by the GitLab downloader to store the IsMergeRequest boolean and sort out issues. --- [source](https://lab.forgefriends.org/forgefriends/forgefriends/-/merge_requests/36) Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
2022-03-18 01:08:35 +08:00
func TestMilestoneList_LoadTotalTrackedTimes(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
miles := issues_model.MilestoneList{
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Milestone{ID: 1}),
}
assert.NoError(t, miles.LoadTotalTrackedTimes())
assert.Equal(t, int64(3682), miles[0].TotalTrackedTime)
}
func TestLoadTotalTrackedTime(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
milestone := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Milestone{ID: 1})
assert.NoError(t, milestone.LoadTotalTrackedTime())
assert.Equal(t, int64(3682), milestone.TotalTrackedTime)
}
func TestCountIssues(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
count, err := issues_model.CountIssues(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.IssuesOptions{})
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, 19, count)
}
func TestIssueLoadAttributes(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
setting.Service.EnableTimetracking = true
issueList := issues_model.IssueList{
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 1}),
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 4}),
}
for _, issue := range issueList {
assert.NoError(t, issue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.RepoID, issue.Repo.ID)
for _, label := range issue.Labels {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.RepoID, label.RepoID)
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: label.ID})
}
if issue.PosterID > 0 {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.PosterID, issue.Poster.ID)
}
if issue.AssigneeID > 0 {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.AssigneeID, issue.Assignee.ID)
}
if issue.MilestoneID > 0 {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.MilestoneID, issue.Milestone.ID)
}
if issue.IsPull {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.ID, issue.PullRequest.IssueID)
}
for _, attachment := range issue.Attachments {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.ID, attachment.IssueID)
}
for _, comment := range issue.Comments {
assert.EqualValues(t, issue.ID, comment.IssueID)
}
if issue.ID == int64(1) {
assert.Equal(t, int64(400), issue.TotalTrackedTime)
assert.NotNil(t, issue.Project)
assert.Equal(t, int64(1), issue.Project.ID)
} else {
assert.Nil(t, issue.Project)
}
}
}
func assertCreateIssues(t *testing.T, isPull bool) {
assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
reponame := "repo1"
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{Name: reponame})
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
milestone := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Milestone{ID: 1})
assert.EqualValues(t, milestone.ID, 1)
reaction := &issues_model.Reaction{
Type: "heart",
UserID: owner.ID,
}
title := "issuetitle1"
is := &issues_model.Issue{
RepoID: repo.ID,
MilestoneID: milestone.ID,
Repo: repo,
Title: title,
Content: "issuecontent1",
IsPull: isPull,
PosterID: owner.ID,
Poster: owner,
IsClosed: true,
Labels: []*issues_model.Label{label},
Reactions: []*issues_model.Reaction{reaction},
}
err := issues_model.InsertIssues(is)
assert.NoError(t, err)
i := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{Title: title})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Reaction{Type: "heart", UserID: owner.ID, IssueID: i.ID})
}
func TestMigrate_CreateIssuesIsPullFalse(t *testing.T) {
assertCreateIssues(t, false)
}
func TestMigrate_CreateIssuesIsPullTrue(t *testing.T) {
assertCreateIssues(t, true)
}