forked from gitea/gitea
1
0
Fork 0
Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
silverwind c7612d178c
Remove meta tags `theme-color` and `default-theme` (#24960)
As discussed in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24953#issuecomment-1565630156.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

1. The `ui.THEME_COLOR_META_TAG` setting has been removed. If you still
need to set the `theme-color` meta tag, add it via
`$GITEA_CUSTOM/templates/custom/header.tmpl` instead.

2. The non-standard `default-theme` meta-tag added in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/13809 has been removed. Third
party code that needs to obtain the currently loaded theme should use
the `theme-<name>` class on the `<html>` node instead, which reflect the
currently active theme.
2023-05-28 22:33:17 +00:00
silverwind 517f9f5aa4
Don't set meta `theme-color` by default (#24340)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24321. By not setting
this meta tag, Safari will use body color for chrome and out-of-viewport
areas, which looks much better then static mismatching green.

As per
[MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/meta/name/theme-color)
it's really only Apple browsers who still support this tag, most others
have dropped support.
2023-04-26 00:56:42 -04:00
wxiaoguang e57e1144c5
Add ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS back, fix explore page bug, make code more strict (#23766)
Follow #21962

After I eat my own dogfood, I would say that
ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS=false is necessary for many private/enterprise
instances, because many private repositories do not have
"description/topic", users just want to search by their names.

This PR also adds `PageIsExploreRepositories` check, to make code more
strict, because the `search` template is shared for different purpose.

And during the test, I found a bug that the "Search" button didn't
respect the "relevant" parameter, so this PR fixes the bug by the way
together.

I think this PR needs to be backported.
2023-03-29 08:41:45 -05:00
Lunny Xiao c53ad052d8
Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.

- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.

Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-20 00:12:01 +08:00